How it will work:
The readings are grouped themes that we will cover throughout the semester. Each week everone is required to read at least one paper from a list of 2 required papers. There will be additional optional papers listed.
The two presenters for the week are responsible to organize their talk as a group beforehand (e.g., so that the same material is not presented multiple times). :
Presenter | Date | Presentation Topics | |
Historical Perspective & Design | |||
1 | Obinna Oparah | 01/27 |
|
2 | Terrance Medina | 01/27 |
|
Imperative Programming (ALGOL) Neuman Machines | |||
3 | Heather Ashby | 02/03 |
|
4 | Jason Cardwell | 02/03 |
|
Functional Programming | |||
5 | Iain Mulligan | 02/10 |
|
6 | Alex Merck | 02/10 |
|
Functional Programming & Parallel Programming | |||
7 | Russell Newquist | 02/17 | |
8 | Kyle McGuinn | 02/17 |
|
Goto Statements | |||
9 | Adan Phun | 02/24 |
|
10 | Jonathan Roeber | 02/24 | Knuth's View ( pdf ) |
Object Oriented Paradigm | |||
11 | Stephanie Tsang | 03/03 |
|
12 | Jimmy Kuni | 03/03 |
|
Scripting Languages | |||
13 | Matt Byrne | 03/17 |
|
14 | 03/17 |
|
|
2nd Presentations |
|
Grading Criteria on Presentations:
- Conveyed Material (60 pts - this is similar to the criteria for writing summaries) see 'reading' page for more details on (a)-(d).
- Problem Definition (15 pts)
- Originality / Approach : Conveyed, Related work (15 pts)
- Evaluation - Assumptions / Limitations (15 pts)
- Result / Impact (15 pts)
- Organization (25 pts)
- Overall Flow (10 pts)
- Individual Slides (10 pts)
- Depth Audience (5 pts ) - Did you target your audience?
- Preparation (15 pts)
- Expertise (5 pts)
- Rehearsed (5 pts)
- Coherence/Cohesiveness (5 pts)