| Secret Name | % | |||||||||||||
| Summary 3 Windows Vitual Machines |
Grade So Far % | Problem Definition | Approach & Originality | Assumptions & Limitations | Result, Impact, Important | Talk Criticism | RAW | % Score | Date Submitted | # Days late | Final Grade | please grade the summaries. See already graded S1 to see example comments (shee with grades for S1 t is already posted, Due date is | ||
| Max | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 09/09 | 0.94 | ||||||
| >24 | 0.70 | |||||||||||||
| Total | 91.2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 8 | ||||||
| Acrobat | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Well done. | |
| Andy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 09/09 | 0 | 0 | No submission | |
| Artistic Potato | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Could be improved by adding more substance but covered all points. | |
| Bamboo | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Nicely Done. | |
| Bellhop One | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | OK | |
| Birdseye | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | OK. | |
| Brimstone | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | ||
| Broadside | 14 | 56 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 56 | 09/09 | 0 | 56 | Not much substance needs more depth. The problem statement is not well defined | |
| Buckeye | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Nicely done. | |
| Buckshot | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 09/09 | 0 | 0 | No submission | |
| Cactus | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Well done. | |
| Carbine | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Excellent! | |
| Carpet | 21 | 84 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 21 | 84 | 09/09 | 0 | 84 | No comment on presenter | |
| Cartwheel | 20 | 80 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 20 | 80 | 09/09 | 0 | 80 | Lacks some insights | |
| Challenger | 23 | 92 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 23 | 92 | 09/09 | 0 | 92 | OK. | |
| Chandelier | 22 | 88 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 22 | 88 | 09/09 | 0 | 88 | Speaker critique too generic | |
| Checkerboard | 15 | 60 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 60 | 09/09 | 0 | 60 | Not much depth (and some information is incorrect), no description how VMs really work, also the critique did not have much substance | |
| Checkmate | 22 | 88 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 22 | 88 | 09/09 | 0 | 88 | No constructive critisicm of the presenter | |
| Coach House | 21 | 84 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 21 | 84 | 09/09 | 0 | 84 | A bit thin speaker critique lacks substance | |
| Companion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 09/09 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Curbside | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | ||
| Driftwood | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Good. | |
| Echo | 15 | 60 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 60 | 09/09 | 0 | 60 | Lacks substance | |
| Firelord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 09/09 | 0 | 0 | Wrong submssion ? Yo submitted the one from last week on monolithic kernels??? | |
| Hudson | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Well done. | |
| Lightfoot | 23 | 92 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 23 | 92 | 09/09 | 0 | 92 | Speaker critique too generic needs to be linked to a specific topic issue not stylistics | |
| Magic | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Different paper than expected well done though | |
| Peninsula | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | cannot read file. (file is damaged) : edit regraded from emailed version - good job on it. | |
| Pincushion | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Great! | |
| Playground | 17 | 68 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 68 | 09/09 | 0 | 68 | Lacks substance - and the speaker critique is too generic. | |
| Pork Chop | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Good. | |
| Professor | 23 | 92 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 23 | 92 | 09/09 | 0 | 92 | Speaker critique too generic needs to be linked to a specific topic issue not stylistics | |
| Punch Bowl | 20 | 80 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 20 | 80 | 09/09 | 0 | 80 | Not much depth, except for one paragraph É should have expanded the summary a bit | |
| Ridgeline | 23 | 92 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 23 | 92 | 09/09 | 0 | 92 | Well done but you have to add more substance to the speaker critique. | |
| Ringside | 23 | 92 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 23 | 92 | 09/09 | 0 | 92 | Speaker critique too generic needs to be linked to a specific topic issue not stylistics | |
| Sandstone | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Great! | |
| Shotgun | 23 | 92 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 23 | 92 | 09/09 | 0 | 92 | Well done you have to add more substance to speaker critique. | |
| Skymaster | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Nicely done. | |
| Storm King | 16 | 64 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 64 | 09/09 | 0 | 64 | Lacks substance - and the speaker critique is too generic. | |
| Sylvester | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 09/09 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Tower | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Nicely done. | |
| Volcano | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | OK. | |
| Windstone | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Good. |