| Secret Name | % | |||||||||||||
| Summary 4 Events & Threads |
Grade So Far % | Problem Definition | Approach & Originality | Assumptions & Limitations | Result, Impact, Important | Talk Criticism | RAW | % Score | Date Submitted | # Days late | Final Grade | please grade the summaries. See already graded S1 to see example comments (shee with grades for S1 t is already posted, Due date is | ||
| Max | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 09/09 | 0.94 | ||||||
| >24 | 0.70 | |||||||||||||
| Total | 88.2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 8 | ||||||
| Acrobat | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Well done. | |
| Andy | 21 | 84 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 21 | 84 | 09/09 | 0 | 84 | Only stylistic remarks and compsure instead of specific concept for presenter critique (infact if seems very similar to your prev | |
| Artistic Potato | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | OK. | |
| Bamboo | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Nicely Done. | |
| Bellhop One | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Well done. | |
| Birdseye | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | OK. | |
| Brimstone | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | ||
| Broadside | 21 | 84 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 21 | 84 | 09/09 | 0 | 84 | Speaker critique is not informative enough. | |
| Buckeye | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Well done. | |
| Buckshot | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 09/09 | 0 | 0 | No submission | ||||||
| Cactus | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Nicely done. Great. | |
| Carbine | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Excellent! | |
| Carpet | 23 | 92 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 23 | 92 | 09/09 | 0 | 92 | Well written but no critique on the presenter | |
| Cartwheel | 21 | 84 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 21 | 84 | 09/09 | 0 | 84 | Lacking some details speaker critique is good though. | |
| Challenger | 23 | 92 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 23 | 92 | 09/09 | 0 | 92 | Well done but speaker critique lacks substance | |
| Chandelier | 16 | 64 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 64 | 09/09 | 0 | 64 | Needs more substance. Presenter critique too generic only about stylistics | |
| Checkerboard | 13 | 52 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 13 | 52 | 09/09 | 0 | 52 | You are not really contrasting why threads are better than events. Only stylistic suggestions rather than on substance | |
| Checkmate | 21 | 84 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 21 | 84 | 09/09 | 0 | 84 | Could have inlcuded more details, the last mpart of you summary is not correct. | |
| Coach House | 20 | 80 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 80 | 09/09 | 0 | 80 | Lacks some insights, a bit thin. | |
| Companion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 09/09 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Curbside | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | ||
| Driftwood | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | OK. | |
| Echo | 13 | 52 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 52 | 09/09 | 0 | 52 | Lacks substance. Not sure if your read the paper at all. Presenter critique too generic only about stylistics | |
| Firelord | 16 | 64 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 64 | 09/09 | 0 | 64 | A bit too thin, No presenter critique | |
| Hudson | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Excellent! | |
| Lightfoot | 20 | 80 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 80 | 09/09 | 0 | 80 | Lacks some insights, a bit thin. | |
| Magic | 20 | 80 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 20 | 80 | 09/09 | 0 | 80 | Lacks some insights. And no speaker critique | |
| Peninsula | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | cannot read file. (file is damaged) : EDIT: Regraded emailed version - and nice solid work. | |
| Pincushion | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Good. | |
| Playground | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 09/09 | 0 | 0 | No submission | |
| Pork Chop | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 09/09 | 0 | 0 | No submission | |
| Professor | 23 | 92 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 23 | 92 | 09/09 | 0 | 92 | Speaker critique is not informative enough (needs to specify what specific topic needs more details). | |
| Punch Bowl | 20 | 80 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 20 | 80 | 09/09 | 0 | 80 | You need to cover the problem in more depth. | |
| Ridgeline | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Well done. | |
| Ringside | 21 | 84 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 21 | 84 | 09/09 | 0 | 84 | Lacks some insights, a bit thin. | |
| Sandstone | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Well done! | |
| Shotgun | 18 | 72 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 72 | 09/09 | 0 | 72 | Lacking substance and depth (especially since this topic is really interesting) | |
| Skymaster | 23 | 92 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 23 | 92 | 09/09 | 0 | 92 | No speaker critique (but you summary is overall of good quality). | |
| Storm King | 15 | 60 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 60 | 09/09 | 0 | 60 | Lacking substance and depth, speaker critique to generic | |
| Sylvester | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 09/09 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Tower | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Nicely done. | |
| Volcano | 20 | 80 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 80 | 09/09 | 0 | 80 | Lacks some insights, and a bit thin. | |
| Windstone | 25 | 100 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 100 | 09/09 | 0 | 100 | Well done. |