Code Design & Implementation (35)							Submission Check List (5)				Report (60)										Report (Adjustment  with Bonus)									Summary (before deductions and lateness)							Deductions
								35				5	82.8	74.3	83.8	73.5	87.5	85.4	74.5	65.3	81.3																	84.6
P3 Web Server		Clean	Elegant not bloated Design	Well Documented Code	No Deadlocks	No Race Conditions	Listener Thread implented well	N Worker Thread Is Maintained	Makefile	Easy to install	Read Me	Easy to Run	What is Implemented	1. Justify Design	Define Shared Data Structures and Justify	2. Describe  & Justify Synchronization	Demonstrate how you avoid concurrency problems	Describe how you tested correctness	3. Describe how you tested efficiency	4. Cmp how it performs with respect to single threaded Server - need perf result an dis it well done (plots?)	5. Are you using  Busy Waiting Is it Justified is it efficent		Report RAW	1. Sync Just (+1 if >0)	2. Design (+1 if >0)	3. Eff Test (+1 if >0)	3. Compare +2 if >0	5. Busy (+1 if >0)	Report Total			Code	Check	Report Total				RAW	Compile Errors  (-20 each Error)	Compile Warnings (-1 each error)	Run Time Errors (-2 each error)	Run Time Output Looks Messy (-1 each messy output statement)		Sub mit	#Days Late	Late Penalty	Total	Total effort	Comments, speak to TA about any issues - see web home page for email address. Total - Red/Blue - effort grades -
Secret Name		5	5	5	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	10	10	5	10	4	4	5	10	2		60									35	5	60	86	93	84	100					100	02/27		2
Apprycle	104	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	1	2	0	1	10	10	5	10	4	4	5	8	2		58	1	1	1	3	1	65			35	4	65	100	80	108	104	0	0	0	0	104	02/27	0	0	104	104	Excellent. Elegant implementation, detailed report.
Avatar Aang	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0	0			0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	02/27	0	0	0	0	No submission
BDNEUIILSDNEHEVEN	96	4	5	5	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	10	8	4	8	4	4	4	8	2		52	1	1	1	3	1	59			34	5	59	97	100	98	98	0	0	0	-2	96	02/27	0	0	96	96	Well implemented code, detailed report.
CodingFreak	80	3	4	4	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	8	6	3	7	2	2	2	6	1		37	1	1	1	3	1	44			31	5	44	89	100	73	80	0	0	0	0	80	02/27	0	0	80	80	No comparison plot, report needs some work
droopylol	65	5	4	3	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	6	2	2	2	2	1	1	4	0		20	1	1	1	3	0	26			32	5	26	91	100	43	63	0	-5	0	-1	57	02/27	0	0	57	65	Please try to include explanations/justifications/experiment results into your report. 5 compile warnings.
Ghost	40	3	3	3	2	2	2	3	1	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0	0			18	4	0	51	80	0	22	0	-1	-10	0	11	03/21	24	48	-37	40	No report submission.
Ishmael	96	5	4	4	5	5	5	5	1	2	0	1	10	8	5	8	4	3	3	10	1		52	1	1	1	3	1	59			33	4	59	94	80	98	96	0	0	0	0	96	02/27	0	0	96	96	Nice performance comparison between single and multi server. The conclusion part is missing?
JJ-Hua	50	4	3	1	5	5	5	5	1	2	0	1	2	0	0	2	3	0	1	2	0		10	0	1	1	3	0	15			28	4	15	80	80	25	47	0	0	0	0	47	02/27	0	0	47	50	Please try to include explanations/justifications/experiment results into your report.
JJ-Spring	50	3	3	1	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	8	2	3	6	2	3	3	6	1		34	1	1	1	3	1	41			27	5	41	77	100	68	73	0	0	0	-3	70	03/15	18	36	34	50	Comparison between single and multi server only shows multi server results.
Maxie	101	5	5	4	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	10	8	5	8	4	4	4	10	2		55	1	1	1	3	1	62			34	5	62	97	100	103	101	0	0	0	0	101	02/27	0	0	101	101	Good job! Server output shows the detailed work processes of worker and listener threads. Very detailed report.
Potato Flower	80	5	4	1	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	8	6	4	4	2	3	3	6	2		38	1	1	1	3	1	45			30	5	45	86	100	75	80	0	0	0	0	80	02/27	0	0	80	80	pthread_mutex is an easier way to avoid concurrency issues
Quetzal	91	4	5	5	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	6	5	5	8	3	2	4	8	2		43	1	1	1	3	1	50			34	5	50	97	100	83	89	0	2	0	0	91	02/27	0	0	91	91	Nicely done.
Sasha Fierce	50	4	4	2	5	5	5	5	1	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0		2	0	0	1	0	0	3			30	4	3	86	80	5	37	0	-5	0	-2	30	02/27	0	0	30	50	Report contains almost no information. 5 compile warnings.
slamminSalmon	70	3	3	1	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	8	2	5	5	3	1	2	5	1		32	1	1	1	3	1	39			27	5	39	77	100	65	71	0	-3	0	0	68	02/28	1	2	66	70	Report is hard to read. 3 compile warnings.
Surreal Meme	50	4	4	1	0	0	0	0	1	2	1	1	4	4	3	6	3	1	1	1	0		23	1	1	1	3	0	29			9	5	29	26	100	48	43	0	0	0	0	43	03/04	7	14	29	50	Code compiles, but not working.
TallPear	60	4	3	1	5	5	5	5	1	2	0	1	8	2	1	6	2	1	1	4	2		27	1	1	1	3	1	34			28	4	34	80	80	57	66	0	0	0	0	66	03/02	5	10	56	60	Please try to include justifications/experiment results into your report.
Test Student Ignore	74	5	3	2	5	5	5	5	1	2	0	1	10	6	4	6	2	3	2	2	1		36	1	1	1	3	1	43			30	4	43	86	80	72	77	0	-2	0	-1	74	02/27	0	0	74	74	Code runs well, but there are 2 compile warnings, and many messy outputs (Do stuff). The report should contain more details.
TheGreenMonkey	77	2	3	1	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	10	10	5	10	4	4	2	0	2		47	1	1	1	0	1	51			26	5	51	74	100	85	82	0	0	0	-5	77	02/27	0	0	77	77	No performance comparison between single and multi server
Thirteen	93	5	4	5	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	8	8	3	8	3	3	4	10	2		49	1	1	1	3	1	56			34	5	56	97	100	93	95	0	0	0	-2	93	02/27	0	0	93	93	Nice report. You don't have to print out the error messages if the errors are intended.
TomatoKetchup	81	4	4	2	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	8	8	3	8	4	3	3	4	2		43	1	1	1	3	1	50			30	5	50	86	100	83	85	0	-2	0	0	83	02/28	1	2	81	81	Please try to include explanations/justifications/experiment results into your report. 2 compile warnings.
Tst	87	5	3	2	5	3	5	5	1	2	1	1	10	9	5	7	2	3	4	6	1		47	1	1	1	3	1	54			28	5	54	80	100	90	87	0	0	0	0	87	02/27	0	0	87	87	Great job.
Zylox	91	3	5	5	5	5	5	5	1	2	1	1	7	8	5	10	3	4	4	3	2		46	1	1	1	3	1	53			33	5	53	94	100	88	91	0	0	0	0	91	02/27	0	0	91	91	Great job.